| Subject |
Author |
Date |
| _nss_cache_cycle_prevention_function trick causes problems with plugins |
Johannes Hofmann |
02/02/2009 12:01 |
| Re: DragonFly-2.1.1.500.ged1bfc DragonFly_RELEASE_2_2 created |
Matthew Dillon |
04/02/2009 01:18 |
| [Fwd: pkgsrc pkgbox DragonFly 2.0.1/i386 2009-01-31 02:10] |
Justin C. Sherrill |
05/02/2009 04:21 |
| 2.2 Release Progress Update #2 |
Matthew Dillon |
09/02/2009 00:50 |
| Re: 2.2 Release Progress Update #2 |
Bill Hacker |
15/02/2009 13:57 |
| Re: 2.2 Release Progress Update #2 |
Matthew Dillon |
16/02/2009 05:35 |
| Re: 2.2 Release Progress Update #2 |
Bill Hacker |
16/02/2009 06:16 |
| AsiaBSDCon 2009 time table updated |
Hiroki Sato |
11/02/2009 23:58 |
| BSDday-AR |
Sdävtaker |
12/02/2009 10:17 |
| Re: BSDday-AR |
Sdävtaker |
26/02/2009 13:08 |
| HAMMER hosed? |
Bill Hacker |
13/02/2009 16:52 |
| Re: HAMMER hosed? |
Simon 'corecode' Schubert |
13/02/2009 17:58 |
| Re: HAMMER hosed? |
Bill Hacker |
13/02/2009 18:18 |
| Re: HAMMER hosed? |
Simon 'corecode' Schubert |
13/02/2009 18:43 |
| Re: HAMMER hosed? |
Bill Hacker |
13/02/2009 18:49 |
| Re: HAMMER hosed? |
Bill Hacker |
13/02/2009 20:38 |
| Re: HAMMER hosed? |
Bill Hacker |
13/02/2009 20:48 |
| Re: HAMMER hosed? |
Bill Hacker |
14/02/2009 04:31 |
| Google Summer of Code 2009 dates |
Justin C. Sherrill |
15/02/2009 04:23 |
| Final freeze for 2.2 release - building ISOs today! Release Monday! |
Matthew Dillon |
15/02/2009 20:00 |
| off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Bill Hacker |
15/02/2009 20:41 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Matthew Dillon |
16/02/2009 05:43 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Bill Hacker |
16/02/2009 06:40 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends - hacked to work |
Bill Hacker |
16/02/2009 09:48 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Michael Neumann |
16/02/2009 10:45 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Michael Neumann |
16/02/2009 11:15 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Bill Hacker |
16/02/2009 15:01 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Matthew Dillon |
16/02/2009 19:54 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Bill Hacker |
17/02/2009 03:06 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Bill Hacker |
16/02/2009 14:55 |
| Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends |
Matthew Dillon |
16/02/2009 19:54 |
| hammer history ls |
Jost Tobias Springenberg |
16/02/2009 14:01 |
| Re: hammer history ls |
Jost Tobias Springenberg |
16/02/2009 23:46 |
| Re: hammer history ls |
Matthew Dillon |
17/02/2009 01:48 |
| Re: hammer history ls |
Bill Hacker |
17/02/2009 03:14 |
| Re: hammer history ls |
Steve O'Hara-Smith |
17/02/2009 05:57 |
| Re: hammer history ls |
Bill Hacker |
17/02/2009 08:56 |
| Re: hammer history ls |
Jost Tobias Springenberg |
17/02/2009 17:47 |
| Re: fdisk implementation [read this before deciding what to do] |
Jost Tobias Springenberg |
17/02/2009 17:54 |
| Re: fdisk implementation [read this before deciding what to do] |
Vincent Stemen |
18/02/2009 05:49 |
| Re: fdisk implementation [read this before deciding what to do] |
Vincent Stemen |
28/02/2009 19:14 |
| Re: fdisk implementation [read this before deciding what to do] |
Bill Hacker |
17/02/2009 18:58 |
| the 'why' of pseudofs |
Bill Hacker |
17/02/2009 21:25 |
| Re: the 'why' of pseudofs |
Michael Neumann |
18/02/2009 01:44 |
| Re: the 'why' of pseudofs |
Matthew Dillon |
18/02/2009 01:45 |
| Re: the 'why' of pseudofs |
Bill Hacker |
18/02/2009 10:14 |
| Re: the 'why' of pseudofs |
Jost Tobias Springenberg |
18/02/2009 10:10 |
| Re: the 'why' of pseudofs |
Bill Hacker |
18/02/2009 11:43 |
| Re: the 'why' of pseudofs |
Steve O'Hara-Smith |
18/02/2009 12:06 |
| Re: the 'why' of pseudofs |
Bill Hacker |
18/02/2009 13:03 |
| EUREKA - was the 'why' of pseudofs |
Bill Hacker |
18/02/2009 17:00 |
| Fwd: EUREKA - was the 'why' of pseudofs |
Colin Adams |
18/02/2009 17:28 |
| Re: Fwd: EUREKA - was the 'why' of pseudofs |
Bill Hacker |
18/02/2009 17:51 |
| tree.h RB_AUGMENT empty body warning |
Dmitri Nikulin |
18/02/2009 11:53 |
| Re: tree.h RB_AUGMENT empty body warning |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
18/02/2009 13:36 |
| Re: tree.h RB_AUGMENT empty body warning |
Matthew Dillon |
18/02/2009 19:46 |
| Re: tree.h RB_AUGMENT empty body warning |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
18/02/2009 23:45 |
| Re: tree.h RB_AUGMENT empty body warning |
Matthew Dillon |
19/02/2009 07:34 |
| Re: tree.h RB_AUGMENT empty body warning |
Dmitri Nikulin |
19/02/2009 10:13 |
| dfky-gui-2.2.0_REL.iso Installer- keyboard not recognized |
invalid |
19/02/2009 17:01 |
| Re: dfky-gui-2.2.0_REL.iso Installer- keyboard not recognized |
Bill Hacker |
20/02/2009 05:34 |
| Re: dfky-gui-2.2.0_REL.iso Installer- keyboard not recognized |
invalid |
21/02/2009 22:46 |
| Re: dfky-gui-2.2.0_REL.iso Installer- keyboard not recognized |
Bill Hacker |
21/02/2009 22:56 |
| Re: dfky-gui-2.2.0_REL.iso Installer- keyboard not recognized |
Sascha Wildner |
21/02/2009 23:11 |
| Re: dfky-gui-2.2.0_REL.iso Installer- keyboard not recognized |
Sascha Wildner |
21/02/2009 23:12 |
| Re: dfky-gui-2.2.0_REL.iso Installer- keyboard not recognized |
invalid |
22/02/2009 16:40 |
| Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Csaba Henk |
21/02/2009 18:39 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
21/02/2009 22:45 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
invalid |
21/02/2009 22:49 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
21/02/2009 23:34 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Dmitri Nikulin |
22/02/2009 01:08 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Jeremy Chadwick |
22/02/2009 03:22 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Dmitri Nikulin |
22/02/2009 03:49 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Jeremy Chadwick |
22/02/2009 14:27 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Justin C. Sherrill |
22/02/2009 05:59 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Michael Neumann |
22/02/2009 12:36 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Jeremy Chadwick |
22/02/2009 14:37 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
22/02/2009 16:07 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Ulrich Spörlein |
22/02/2009 19:19 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Jeremy Chadwick |
22/02/2009 19:51 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
22/02/2009 20:53 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Jeremy Chadwick |
22/02/2009 21:59 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 05:17 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Michael Neumann |
22/02/2009 21:45 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Ulrich Spörlein |
23/02/2009 19:51 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 06:48 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 06:49 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
22/02/2009 15:50 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 06:50 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Robert Luciani |
23/02/2009 10:35 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 10:54 |
| [no subject] |
Unknown |
23/02/2009 16:49 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 20:08 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 17:52 |
| [no subject] |
Unknown |
25/02/2009 17:15 |
| [no subject] |
Unknown |
23/02/2009 16:23 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 20:08 |
| Re: OT - was Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 06:51 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Csaba Henk |
22/02/2009 12:04 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 06:51 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 07:10 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Jasse Jansson |
23/02/2009 16:23 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Kyle Butt |
23/02/2009 16:54 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 17:43 |
| Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption |
Freddie Cash |
23/02/2009 20:09 |
| mirror-stream over ssh w/o 'root' privs |
Bill Hacker |
22/02/2009 21:51 |
| Re: mirror-stream over ssh w/o 'root' privs |
Matthew Dillon |
25/02/2009 18:10 |
| Re: mirror-stream over ssh w/o 'root' privs |
Steve O'Hara-Smith |
25/02/2009 22:58 |
| New mirror in Russia |
Justin C. Sherrill |
23/02/2009 04:53 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 05:18 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Justin C. Sherrill |
24/02/2009 02:19 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Bill Hacker |
24/02/2009 05:39 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Constantine A. Murenin |
24/02/2009 16:50 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Justin C. Sherrill |
25/02/2009 04:02 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Matt Emmerton |
25/02/2009 04:33 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Matthias Schmidt |
25/02/2009 08:56 |
| Re: New mirror in Russia |
Constantine A. Murenin |
25/02/2009 13:43 |
| BFBI OTT bug or limitation? |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 08:50 |
| Re: BFBI OTT bug or limitation? |
Robert Luciani |
23/02/2009 10:06 |
| Re: BFBI OTT bug or limitation? |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 10:21 |
| Re: BFBI OTT bug or limitation? UPDATE |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 10:14 |
| Re: BFBI OTT bug or limitation? UPDATE2 |
Bill Hacker |
23/02/2009 10:37 |
| Re: BFBI OTT bug or limitation? UPDATE2 |
Matthew Dillon |
25/02/2009 18:06 |
| Re: BFBI OTT bug or limitation? UPDATE2 |
Bill Hacker |
26/02/2009 03:11 |
| Patch for libdvdread-4.1.3 on DragonFly |
Steve O'Hara-Smith |
23/02/2009 10:10 |
| Re: Patch for libdvdread-4.1.3 on DragonFly |
Thomas Klausner |
23/02/2009 11:16 |
| Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Jurij Kovacic |
23/02/2009 13:40 |
| Re: Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Matthias Schmidt |
23/02/2009 18:48 |
| Re: Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Jurij Kovacic |
23/02/2009 20:11 |
| Re: Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Matthew Dillon |
25/02/2009 16:51 |
| Re: Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Jurij Kovacic |
25/02/2009 19:24 |
| Re: Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Bill Hacker |
26/02/2009 03:02 |
| Re: Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Matthias Schmidt |
26/02/2009 07:38 |
| Re: Hammer FS: imposing a size limit on PFS? |
Matthew Dillon |
27/02/2009 00:49 |
| for Google SoC 2009 |
dark0s Optik |
23/02/2009 18:39 |
| Re: for Google SoC 2009 |
Matthias Schmidt |
23/02/2009 18:44 |
| Re: for Google SoC 2009 |
Jordan Gordeev |
23/02/2009 18:58 |
| HEADS UP: ig_hal is required for em(4) |
Sepherosa Ziehau |
24/02/2009 12:57 |
| Hammer question |
Mag Gam |
25/02/2009 01:53 |
| Re: Hammer question |
Matthew Dillon |
25/02/2009 03:05 |
| Re: Hammer question |
Mag Gam |
25/02/2009 03:47 |
| new dflybsd mirror |
Sergey V. Dyatko |
26/02/2009 09:30 |
| Re: new dflybsd mirror |
Simon 'corecode' Schubert |
26/02/2009 09:49 |
| MFC for 2.2.1 - sub-release in 2 weeks on approximately 15-March |
Matthew Dillon |
01/03/2009 01:10 |
| Re: hammer: undelete and questions |
Matthew Dillon |
01/03/2009 02:46 |
| Re: hammer: undelete and questions |
Matthew Dillon |
01/03/2009 03:16 |
| Re: hammer: undelete and questions |
Matthew Dillon |
01/03/2009 07:12 |
