Re: hammer history ls

[Bill Hacker <wbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:14:16 +0800
> Bill Hacker <wbh@conducive.org> wrote:
>
> > All-numeral dating might be more human-language independent, and an 
> > input-format reminder built-in, as in:
> >
> > --startDDMMYYYY=20092008 --endDDMMYYYY=01012009
>
> 	For all numeric it's probably best to use ISO8601 formats like
> yyyymmdd, yyyymmddThhmm, yyyymmddThhmmss and even hhmmss.

Agree that. Also more consistent with other utils aleady in-place.

(wonder why  ...)

;-)

Bill