Re: Hammer or ZFS based backup, encryption

[Bill Hacker <wbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jasse Jansson wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Bill Hacker wrote:
*trimmed*

> > But there we are, Startup 'seeding; is unavidable, but thereafter ... 
> > among other things, looking to reduce the reliance on rsync (and 
> > similar CVS'ish or git'ish techniques) having to 'inventory' stuff at 
> > a high per-file level that a 'hammer mirror-stream' (or GMIRROR to 
> > networked RAID) could do 'as you go along' at a lower level - closer 
> > to the actual blocks as they are being written.
> >
> > How, and how well, would ZFS handle redundant pools on separate sites?
> >
> > And can that be a streaming process - even if that means the 
> > redundancy target is r/o for 'the duration', as a hammer slave would be?
>
> I have not tried it myself, but there is a ZFS send/receive command,
> that might do the trick.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kaiser Jasse -- Authorized Stealth Oracle

Looks promising. VERY promising...:

http://docs.huihoo.com/opensolaris/solaris-zfs-administration-guide/html/ch06s03.html

Thanks for pointing that out....

Bill