Re: any interest in importing pf?

[Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:23:50 +0000, Hiten Pandya wrote:

> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> 
>> My thought of that... Anyone shouldn't replace or remove neither, but just
>> add PF to have one more choice of firewall. :-) Unless, IPF and PF can't
>> play together nice, then it explains.
> 
> 	Donno about this, but we will surely need to update the
> 	PFIL_HOOKS code in-order to bring in OpenBSD's Packet Filter.
> 
>> If add PF, then it means one of you will have to bring ALTQ in too? CARP
>> will be insterest to play with too, btw.
> 
> 	We don't have to bring in ALTQ, but it would be good to have it
> 	IMHO.  As far as CARP is concerned, I wonder if FreeVRRP by the
> 	KAME project is better than it or not, is still yet to be
> 	researched.

I agree about ALTQ!

Cheers,
Mezz

> 	Regards,


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.