DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-12
Re: configuration files
Richard Coleman <Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> > -On [20031211 21:02], Richard Coleman (Richard.Coleman@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >> Well, I wasn't necessarily arguing for using xml or any other
> >> specific format. But since I'm bored at work, I'll put on my
> >> bikeshed helmet and throw in my thoughts.
> > Could you please refrain from already labeling a discussion a
> > bikeshed?
> > It makes me want to stop participating in these discussions. Because
> > then it is basically said: hey, I am wondering about X, but since I know
> > it is futile we'll just talk. Personally I like to treat each
> > discussion/idea as something possibly worthwhile to invest a lot of time
> > in.
> I thought it was obvious this was a joke. I guess not.
> Personally, I think it is a very interesting discussion and a topic
> that I've thought about alot about over the years. And although I
> will talk about it as much as people can tolerate, I will admit that I
> think it is a futile discussion. Sorry, but I'm just being honest.
Perhaps only futile as it pertains to DragonFly but perhaps not to
others who may want to hash out such a discussion later. This stuff
gets logged and subsequently googled :).
SO FOR ALL YOU GOOGLERS OUT THERE SEARCHING FOR PORN
[insert dirty porn stuff...]
> Richard Coleman