Re: sendmail as a secondary MX

[Janet Sullivan <ciscogeek@xxxxxxxx>]

Bill Hacker wrote:
> Janet Sullivan wrote:
>
> > OK, I'm confused.  I'm using the exact same configuration for sendmail 
> > on DF 1.1-CURRENT that I had on FreeBSD 4.11, but I'm seeing very 
> > different results.
> >
> > For my domain bgp4.net, I have nj.bgp4.net set as MX 10 (the primary) 
> > and tx.bgp4.net set as MX 20 (the secondary).
>
> Which,of those is running DragonFlyBSD?
> tx.bgp4.net only, or both?
>
> Which, (both?) is running Sendmail?

tx is running Dragonfly.  nj is running FreeBSD 4.11.  Both run 
sendmail.  However, I don't think nj's config enters into the problem, 
as tx never attempts to relay mail over to nj.

> Do you have a before and after of /etc/groups, etc/master.password?

Yes. Everything looks kosher.

> Is everything being run with the same EUID, EGID as before the change?

Yes.

> Are various files and directories still under the same ownership and 
> mode as before the change?

Yes.

> Are two instances of an MTA being requested, and in contention over the 
> port?

No.

The only difference I see off the bat is that before converting 
tx.bgp4.net to DragonFly, it was running sendmail 8.13.1, while on DF it 
now uses 8.12.10.