Re: Standards Conformance

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 02:18:22AM -0600, Jason Smethers wrote:
> This brings up the question. What do we want to do in reguards to 
> conformance to multiple specifications? Should all of them be listed, or 
> should a "best one" be picked?

I'd like indication of the minimal standard, according to the following
hierachie:

1. ISO C89
2. POSIX
3. SUS

ISO C99 feature should be marked explicitly as such, as well as extensions
from *BSD or glibc.

Joerg

> 
> - Jason