|From:||"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:14:07 +0200|
Not trying to argue with you, but simply trying to discern the differences between the release cycles of DF and FBSD, it seems to me that DF's RELEASE release cycle is a mixture of FBSD's Release and Stable with some native features.
DF's patches are committed without thorough testing (like FBSD Stable) and RELEASE sub-versions are bumped up without code freezes, release candidates or betas (native to DF).
When DF full RELEASE versions are bumped up (I think) there are code freezes (like FBSD Release).
If this is in fact the way DF RELEASE releases come out, I fail to see
why a 1.6.2 would be "safer" than the official 1.6.0 (or for that matter
1.4.3 vs. 1.40).
I'm simply trying to plan for the best release to install on the production server.
-- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Description: This is a digitally signed message part