Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

[Siju George <sgeorge.ml@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you.
>
> I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than
> rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its
> snapshot distribution in different intervals for archiving purposes.
> This is the one thing rsnapshot does extremely well; I was just trying to say
> this is a good idea we should steal :-)
>

hope Matt will agree ;-)

--Siju