Re: linux syscall madvise

[Alex Hornung <ahornung@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sure, but point is that this won't fix much. You can, if you want to,
submit a patch with the relevant code, it's straight forward.
Main aim still remains to get LTP running, so all missing syscalls,
most of them way more important than madvise, can be identified.

Thanks for your effort,
Alex Hornung

2010/1/5 Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>:
> On Tuesday 05 January 2010 12:56:43 Alex Hornung wrote:
>> madvise is of no real relevance and is normally not a big deal either.
>> Implementing an empty dummy function will work perfectly fine as it
>> isn't required to do anything.
>
> True, but there is a madvise in DFly, so the Linux call can be implemented as
> the DFly call for the functions they both have, and dummy for the rest.
>
> Pierre
>
> --
> .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
> .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
> .icu'u la ma'atman.
>