DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2008-01
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: cvsup
People shouldn't worry about server side overhead all that much. Cpu
cycles are cheap and the cvs tree is completely cached in memory anyway.
And the only effect that extra network bandwidth has is that it takes
a little longer to run the operation. Now, granted, we don't want people
to be downloading a whole copy's worth of network bandwidth every day,
but rsync is close enough that I just don't care.
One of the original reasons for using cvsup was so people could maintain
local branches of the repository. I don't think people do this much
anymore, if they do it all. Disk space is so cheap these days that
keeping a master sync copy and a separate one for local work is not a big
deal.
-Matt
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cvsup
- From: Bill Hacker <wbh@conducive.org>
- Re: cvsup
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- References:
- cvsup
- From: Vincent Stemen <vs1@crel.us>
- Re: cvsup
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- Re: cvsup
- From: Vincent Stemen <vs1@crel.us>
- Re: cvsup
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- Re: cvsup
- From: Vincent Stemen <vs1@crel.us>
- Re: cvsup
- From: Bill Hacker <wbh@conducive.org>
- Re: cvsup
- From: Vincent Stemen <vs1@crel.us>
- Re: cvsup
- From: "Justin C. Sherrill" <justin@shiningsilence.com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]