| To: | Antonio Bravo <tonio@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| From: | Vácalv Haisman <v.haisman@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:12:16 +0100 |
| Face: | iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEUnMzWJm5S+0864pn5r blp/hnW2up7X7uqftbNRVUrW1LGBdGfHwJqPi3ScoYtBQzhDxGEwAAAAB3RJTUUH1QoQDDgyQtx8 HQAAAkNJREFUeJzFU0toU0EUPYu66CpGdCUUmoUJkpUDQUoNBVEUrBJsq1Ki2EIKIUZ8mydBhYi0 wVUXJVCLCrFN4DIEQdxIqdBIFsMkWD9YJClCRGKjJaviynjfe8RPogtXPcObuXPOPXd+PHj+Aeyo QNmobGLXVeANGM+GsP0B2yqHHNVoCD2LwLglVGZx7yXSlADR0uZu9C4Bpy3hUxPvH/cuUw6UoPCL h64I8KAJuMpwRU8uUMJy0OIpHVeXmulZoCc/t0LlTbJLEY1EudPRcnVjgAP5Osdl4K5HVP4+2bAI okaUA0Iq6Q59+Zy2eMWN6EpFTsa3+uD1+JKj4TPHuYTSMaLScLAaqk94YJqG4ds30hojOVgYoNJc NTztNU2TBYbhu9Aafnq08ORja37da1NwBrN/b7NVEc+b8yecuYkp08vNvLYneVZRaSH1vS0UnfHm OUPzWaZufHPmCWSdWrfeGVQQKmcsO4If8pAdXJ/xF4QQAeOVY1AQQcfirwkLUWeWVTgi6vaGt2xe BGzBEIMQorru8RxgPqY1V6uxYnwVBRZEI1ytCm3dE8mC2DgcbzCJGHdBEVDKuWDSwsrSGoqzJmNt 2jJpNueIH0qS8/0JrDKnVBdvOzIsdVr4zaX9dn9xcLLKdCtQGfutVacLE9Ja+yfbDvO4aMWrklfK /JYv15C8Kw9S10kup5Bys0N1bLdcn4HvTl/Xlh6Fpllwj5/XpH9BUXn/ym0Dvv7Rt2MywojpYiSi i7Hsscaa19zZ//y/hR+BT/ns80nmJAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== |
Antonio Bravo wrote: > Den Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:08:58 +0100, skrev Erik Wikström: > > >> Are you using the same version of gcc? I seem to recall that there were >> some performance issues about C++, but that might have been gcc 4. >> >> Erik Wikström > > NetBSD: gcc-3.3.3, OpenBS: gcc-3.3.5 > and well DragonFly-1.4.0 is gcc-3.4.5 > > compilator behavior is what I had in mind first too, but they are all > minor version of the 3.x serie. While it is "only" the minor version number that is different the changes in GCC are substantial as far as I know. Though the 200% time change sounds too much. Are all the ports using same optimization levels? > I will search through the gnu-gcc list... > > > antonio. VH
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature