Re: [OT] Micro$oft versus security

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

walt wrote:
> > Nevertheless they have been broken recently (about one year) and for 
> > MD5 for example single bits can be changed...
> Okay, that's why I asked -- I didn't know that.  But why take a year
> to break a secure hash when you can use a buffer overrun to gain
> access to ten thousand Windows machines in a few minutes ;o)

Oh, maybe I didn't write this clear enough:  the vulnerability was found 
about one year ago.  Adjusting the data so the MD5 sum stays the same is 
a matter of a few cycles.

cheers
  simon


--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \