Re: VKernel progress update - 8 Jan 2006 (milestone reached!)

[walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Will a virtual kernel be able to run another virtual kernel as one of
> :its user processes?
> 
. 
. 
. 
>     The biggest limitation to these environments is simply going to be
>     available system memory.  If you tell a virtual kernel that it has
>     256M of main memory, then it will only really be happy if it can
>     actually use 256M of main memory without thrashing the real system.

On a system which is running only a virtual kernel (and just enough
stuff to support the virtual kernel) how much memory does the real
kernel need?