Re: VKernel progress update - 8 Jan 2006 (milestone reached!)

[walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Okay, but I guess no other subsystem would benefit from this.  However, h=
> :ow do you manage to "break out"?  You'd have to have some kind of context=
> : switching, right?

>     Right now a virtual kernel runs as a single user process on the real
>     kernel...

Will a virtual kernel be able to run another virtual kernel as one of
its user processes?