DragonFly bugs List (threaded) for 2007-07
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> This is because vinum is trying to write into the label area
> for the drive, because you have partition 'a' starting at block #0.
>
confirming bumping start up to 16 (per your 8192 number) clears this up,
as well as bumping up to 10 (per sizeof(struct dfly_disklabel)) .
Seeing as it seems like I'm the only one using this,
I'm okay to break backwords compat. :)
just kidding.. sort-of.
- Chris
- References:
- 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Chris Turner <c.turner@199technologies.org>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Chris Turner <c.turner@199technologies.org>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Chris Turner <c.turner@199technologies.org>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]