DragonFly bugs List (threaded) for 2007-07
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
Matthew Dillon wrote:
The question is whether we can simply require that vinum partitions
skip the label area (i.e. the starting block has to be at least 16
for a partition created with a normal disklabel) or whether there
are backwards compatibility issues that require us to support vinum
writing into the disk's label area.
The problem is rather that you can place a partition into the label area. This should be off limits.
cheers
simon
--
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
- References:
- 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Chris Turner <c.turner@199technologies.org>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Chris Turner <c.turner@199technologies.org>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Chris Turner <c.turner@199technologies.org>
- Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?
- From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]