DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2008-03
Re: [GSoC] the AMD64 port
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I'm a student interested in doing the AMD64 port as a Google Summer of
:I would like to have some questions answered, in order to be able to
:make an informed decision.
: 1. Does porting require messing with the source code of gcc/binutils/gdb?
This might need a little work. 64 bit world builds will generate
a 64 bit cross compiler which the 64 bit kernel build should use (when
building on a 32 bit platform), but currently our libraries in /usr/lib
use a single path for 32 or 64 bit libs so we can't build a compiler that
This means you should be able to work on a 64 bit kernel without messing
with the compiler sources, though we might need to do a few small
I think it would be beneficial for our 2.0 release to actually go through
the pain of moving our 32 bit libraries into a i386 or amd64 subdirectory,
with the original directory turned into a softlink, or something like
that so we would be able to have both targets on the same architecture.
That's probably a mini-project in of itself.
I may be repeating myself :), but I feel I should mention that Noah Yan
(the guy who did the pc64/amd64 stuff we have already in base) has
~330KB of uncommitted stuff lying in his git repo at
http://repo.or.cz/w/dragonfly/port-amd64.git. It would be a pity if this
work would be repeated again.
I've put the patch also here:
I was thinking about just committing it so others can pick up, although
pc64 world is again broken with this stuff in and I also am not 100%
sure if it generally makes things better or worse.