Re: BIND 9.3 in base

[walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
>
> > Hereby I want to poll whether people find it useful to have BIND 9.3 
> > (9.3.1) in base, as opposed to 9.2.4ish currently there. Major feature 
> > for me being the support for IPv6 transfers, which would help the 
> > resolver as well (do we actually use BIND's resolver? not sure). I 
> > spoke very shortly with Jeroen about this, but I'd like to hear other 
> > opinions as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >         -- Thomas E. Spanjaard
> >            tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > p.s.
> > Yes, I'm a bit of an IPv6 evangelist.


> Me too, but perhaps IPv6 it is something more important in Netherlands 
> (Europe/Azia too?) then in the US?

IMO the reason IPV6 has not been pushed in the U.S. is that Micro$oft
thinks it is not important for their bottom line.  When and if that
time arrives you can bet that the adoption of IPV6 in the U.S. will be
$wift (and expen$ive for M$ cu$tomer$).

No, I'm not cynical -- my wife is entirely wrong about that...