DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2004-01
Re: The Trolling on the freebsd- lists
-On [20040106 11:22], Miguel Mendez (flynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>Yet the goals are indeed different. DragonFly is about trying new stuff
>that would never make it into FreeBSD (VFS layer, Lightweight Kernel
>Threading, Message passing API, etc). FreeBSD is much more conservative
>in a lot of areas than DragonFly is. Also Bill Huei has made a good
>point about the ownership of kernel areas in FreeBSD, stuff others are
>not supposed to touch.
I must say that the checkpointing, variable symbolic links, and the
message passing are pretty exciting stuff to have and we will continue
>I plan to benchmark both DragonFly and FreeBSD and will publish the
>results, even though after the recent trolling we've seen it might be a
>bit touchy subject.
Using Felix Leitner's stuff? I already did some benchmarks a while ago.
I would be happy to work on this with you and make sure we test all the
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9DB7 9D88 97E6 839B 2EAC 625B
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://diary.in-nomine.org/
The way to love anything is to realize that it might be lost...