|From:||"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:13:34 +0200|
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:18:49AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:I removed the comment because it is simply incorrect. If there should beThe comment should be put back in, and clarified even more then it currently is. e.g. I don't understand why the full negative range is allowed when only one or two directory entries are faked up, or why the wraparound test was removed.
a comment, it should descripe why the on-disk offset in the directory is
not, but the added comment didn't do that. Arguments against using it
that way is the complication of code [for a secondary filesystem] and
the possible security issues coming from it.
-- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low $$$ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Description: This is a digitally signed message part