DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2011-04
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: ACPI based interrupt routing and new ACPI code ready for testing
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Max Herrgard<herrgard@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau<sepherosa@gmail.com> wrote:
This interrupt sharing may caused by interrupt routing in ACPI code.
What's the vmstat -iv on both w/ and w/o ACPI interrupt routing?
Yes they are a bit different.
OK, please test following commit on master:
40ad81aa20e2ba47db1f04204a60ffd06b513150
Nope. Still the same, but they are now on different irqs. I noticed
however that my drm0 doesn't get set up with acpi interrupt routing
turned on.
With acpi interrupt routing:
interrupt total rate
irq0: clk 31844 248
irq4: sio0 0 0
irq7: ppc0 1 0
irq9: acpi0 0 0
irq10: ral0/rl0/vge0/ehci0 7536 58
irq11: fwohci0/pcm0/rl1/atapci0/uhci0/uhci1/uhci2/uhci3 9982 77
irq14: ata0 37 0
irq15: ata1 0 0
irq19 46 0
irq21 6525 50
irq192: swi_siopoll 0 0
irq195: swi_cambio 0 0
irq196: swi_vm 0 0
irq197: swi_taskq/swi_mp_taskq 0 0
Total 55971 437
Without:
interrupt total rate
irq0: clk 331584 331
irq4: sio0 0 0
irq5: vge0/uhci0/uhci1/drm0 55565 55
irq7: ppc0 0 0
irq9: acpi0 0 0
irq10: ral0/rl0/ehci0 20317 20
irq11: fwohci0/pcm0/rl1/atapci0/uhci2/uhci3 3386 3
irq14: ata0 37 0
irq15: ata1 0 0
irq19 46 0
irq21 3472 3
irq192: swi_siopoll 0 0
irq195: swi_cambio 0 0
irq196: swi_vm 0 0
irq197: swi_taskq/swi_mp_taskq 0 0
Total 414407 413
Max
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]