Re: Minimum size for a hammer file system?

[Sascha Wildner <saw@xxxxxxxxx>]

Am 23.04.2010 09:19, schrieb Colin Adams:
> I thought I had previously seen (on this mailing list) advice that
> hammer was designed for use on 500GB systems or bigger. Accordingly, as
> I only have a 160GB drive, I am not using it.
>
> But just now (after reading some of today's messages), I took a look at
> http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/ to learn more about hammer. There is
> says it is designed to be used on 50GB or more. So was I misreading
> earlier, or have improvements meant it is now practical for smaller file
> systems?

50MB is what we recommend officially, thought people also have run it on 
smaller disks.

The 500 you read surely was a typo.

Sascha

--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx