Re: [issue1357] A cloned tap device patch (for a person to test KQEMU 1.4.0pre1 for QEMU 0.10.1)

[Naoya Sugioka <naoya.sugioka@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Sephe,

Sorry for the slow res too.
The response mail to submit@... failed some reasons, also it took me a
few days to realize  :-)

I'll test your 3 patches for a while and your patches (including
'closed-out' flag operation)
work well with qemu/kqemu environment.

BTW, I guess we need a small patch for qemu to open correct tap device
node (ex /dev/tap*0*),
as I attached, but it is another story. I'm appreciate if someone can
take care of the patch, if need.

thanks a lot for your assistance.
-Naoya

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau (via DragonFly issue
tracker) <submit@crater.dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
>
> Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naoya Sugioka <naoya.sugioka@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Sephe,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your comment. Here I made a patch which includes you pointed.
>>> I hope you will review this patch too.
>>> - Naoya
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, I will review it today.
>
> Could you test following three patches:
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/0001-tap-4-Add-ifclone-support.patch
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/0002-tap-4-Correct-reversed-logic.patch
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/0003-tap-4-More-fixes-to-tapuponopen.patch
>
> The first one is an adjusted version of your submitted patch.
>
> Best Regards,
> sephe
>
> _____________________________________________________
> DragonFly issue tracker <bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org>
> <http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1357>
> _____________________________________________________
>

Attachment: net.c.diff
Description: Binary data