Re: Filesystem encryption

[Chris Turner <c.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 
>     I'm not planning on it for 2.0, just getting HAMMER's base
>     functionality implemented is already pretty challenging.  But there's
>     nothing particularly difficult about the concept.
> 

lo.. been AWOL awhile but lurking.

anyway, what's the take on a simple hook for vn/vnconfig or similar.
seems like that would be a simple way to get the basic functionality
without too much VFS muckery..

2c