Re: load balancing

[walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

1103073858.GB829@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <454c434a$0$788$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611050130.kA51UsoS011131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <200611050130.kA51UsoS011131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <454dd899$0$788$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.234.191.24
X-Trace: 1162729625 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 788 69.234.191.24
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.users:7945

Matthew Dillon wrote:
>  ...In fact, if machine overhead is the biggest issue then the most extreme
>     answer is to not use threading at all... instead, go with a strict
>     kqueue poll for the core web server and fork one process for each cpu on
>     the system...

Is this kind of change something that can be done just by changing
the server's config files?  Or would it involve rewriting code?