Re: GNU make not installed

[Erik Wikström <erik-wikstrom@xxxxxxxxx>]

e> <50506.66.192.38.82.1145464651.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060419173709.GA4175@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <20060419173709.GA4175@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <44467bba$0$771$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.231.157.81
X-Trace: 1145469883 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 771 81.231.157.81
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.users:5562

On 2006-04-19 19:37, joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:37:31PM -0400, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
>> On Wed, April 19, 2006 9:19 am, joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:06:37AM -0400, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
>> >> Is there a reason we would not want this to be default behavior?  i.e.
>> >> release with DEPENDS_TARGET and BINPKG_SITES defined?
>> >
>> > Because you want to build from source to get specific options etc.?
>> > BINPKG_SITES with a default value would make sense though.
>> 
>> 
>> Wouldn't people who want to build from source with specific options be
>> doing 'bmake (options) install"?
> 
> Depends. I *think* it is more common to place them in /etc/mk.conf, but
> that might differ.

I thought that you placed the options in mk.conf to avoid having to put 
them all on the command-line.

Erik Wikström
-- 
  "I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
  telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure
  out how to use my telephone" -- Bjarne Stroustrup