Re: errno contain 672964768

["Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:06:35 +0100
joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:15:22PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >     Yup.  That's &errno instead of errno.
> 
> Nope, it isn't. I don't know why, but gdb returns just garbage. I'll do
> some testing with thread local variables, I expect gdb is doing junk
> with them.

	In the similar problem in sylpheed a printf produced the same
garbage as gdb.

-- 
C:>WIN                                      |   Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins.                | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    licences available see
                                            |    http://www.sohara.org/