Re: rl0: watchdog timeout

[Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/7/05, Emiel Kollof <coolvibe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Op vrijdag 07 oktober 2005 13:59, schreef Sepherosa Ziehau:
> > On 10/7/05, Emiel Kollof <coolvibe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since I moved a box up to HEAD, I've been seeing lots of these in my
> > > dmesg:
> > >
> > > rl0: watchdog timeout
> >
> > It is OK for rl(4), you can just ignore it.
> > Actually rl(4) on HEAD or Preview is better than its counterpart on
> > Release.
>
> I do have massive slowdowns with NFS because of it (or because of something

Sorry, didn't notice that in the previous mail -_-.  But please try
the attachment.

Best Regards,
sephe

> triggered by it). The watchdog message appears, and then performance turns to
> shit. Happens on PREVIEW and HEAD. Wasn't happening on RELEASE.
>
> Cheers,
> Emiel
> --
> The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the
> difference between lightning and the lightning bug.
>                 -- Mark Twain
>
>
>


--
Live Free or Die

Index: if_rl.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /opt/df_cvs/src/sys/dev/netif/rl/if_rl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 if_rl.c
--- if_rl.c	14 Jun 2005 14:19:22 -0000	1.25
+++ if_rl.c	7 Oct 2005 13:00:36 -0000
@@ -1622,6 +1622,7 @@ rl_watchdog(struct ifnet *ifp)
 
 	rl_txeof(sc);
 	rl_rxeof(sc);
+	rl_reset(sc);
 	rl_init(sc);
 
 	crit_exit();