Re: pkgsrc or dfports?

["Martin P. Hellwig" <mhellwig@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
<cut>
> Well, ports+dfports is still the 'official' way, but developers have
> mostly stopped developing and patching for it, and moved to pkgsrc.
> Although pkgsrc isn't the ideal replacement, Justin's ipm isn't finished
> yet and pkgsrc offers the best alternative. I don't know if there's a
> cvsup server for pkgsrc, as it originates from NetBSD where anoncvs is
> the popular choice.
<cut>
Out of curiosity, when mixing ports+dfport & pkgsrc ports having the 
target directory /usr/local what great evil will happen?

I like to use pkgsrc but I also want to fallback to ports if a port 
hasn't been made to pkgsrc.
I also saw that pkgsrc in the dragonfly incarnation uses bmake, whats up 
with that why not make?

--
mph