Re: symlink app lib to common libs

["Jonas Sundström" <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Walter <walter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:13:18 +0200
> > 
> > 	OK - so you only package the libs with unstable APIs :)
> 
> (Non-guru type here again)  Would it make sense to have a
> "lib" directory in each app's folder, as was suggested,
> and then symlink to the actual library?

You loose the only real benefit of the app/lib approach,
which is to have the required [non-base] libs it needs, 
safe and sound with the application.

It's not a silver bullet.

/Jonas Sundström.               www.kirilla.com