From: | "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:27:02 +0100 |
On Thursday, 3. February 2005 00:09, M. Schatzl wrote: > I suspect there might be sth. more sophisticated to get along with a > thing like code containing fork()s, which isn't exactly rare. I know > about the follow-fork-mode, but it doesn't seem to work. it *does* not work. it's not implemented. we don't have it. sadly. want to do some kernel (ptrace) coding? :) cheers simon -- /"\ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature