DragonFly submit List (threaded) for 2008-02
Re: DragonFly mail agent (round two)
* Michael Neumann wrote:
> I haven't heard of dma, but I like the idea. I don't need sendmail on boxes
> other than the mail server. For all other boxes a local delivery is enough.
That's the reason why corecode@ and me wrote dma :)
> Does that mean we get rid of sendmail someday? I mean, it can always be
> installed from pkgsrc.
This is the long term goal. If dma(8) is considered stable enough we
hook it up to the build as a sendmail replacement.
> Next replace named/bind by a caching-only proxy. I don't see a reason to
> include a DNS server, but for example no web-server.
I'm not sure about that one. You can't compare BIND with sendmail in
they're fine without BIND. But the admins who use it (like me) are very
happy that a full nameserver is included in the base.
> Other examples are ntpd.