Re: [PATCH] [V2] add options to ps(1) to display lwp data

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nicolas Thery wrote:
> Doing so could be done if p_lwps were turned into a TAILQ.  This seems
> feasible as there are less than 10 occurrences of p_lwps and the added
> RAM footprint to struct proc is small.
>
> What do you think of this? Is it sensible?

I don't think so.  What's the gain?  Without -H, ps should probably aggregate the information of all lwps.

cheers
 simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \