Re: multi-vkd support patch for review

["Sepherosa Ziehau" <sepherosa@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/28/07, Thomas E. Spanjaard <tgen@netphreax.net> wrote:
> C.Turner wrote:
> > @@ -159,7 +161,8 @@
> >                               netifFile[netifFileNum++] = optarg;
> >                       break;
> >               case 'r':
> > -                     rootImageFile = optarg;
> > +                     if ( vkdFileNum < VKD_MAX )
> > +                             vkdFile[vkdFileNum++] = optarg;
> >                       break;
> >               case 'm':
> >                       Maxmem_bytes = strtoull(optarg, &suffix, 0);
>
> Why not if (vkdFileNum < VKD_MAX) { vkdFile[vkdFileNum] = optarg;
> vkdFileNum++; }; ? Because now it appears '16' is a valid number, where

Why '16'(VKD_MAX) will be a valid number in his patch?

Best Regards,
sephe

--
Live Free or Die