Re: replace true(1) and false(1) with simple shell scripts

[David Cuthbert <dacut@xxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     We are going to stick with the C version.  There is no reason to nerf
>     the performance of the programs even if one assumes that they will
>     hardly ever be used in a time-critical situation.  It certainly isn't
>     worth the byte-savings for the files since they are already only
>     3280 bytes each.

But the assembly versions allow the following loop to run in half the time:

    while true; do done;


;-)