DragonFly submit List (threaded) for 2005-04
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: NTPD synchronisation patches
-On [20050414 08:52], Joerg Sonnenberger (joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>Which keeps the question why the initial correction did not happen.
>You have been using -s? Did it report any error?
As we discussed on IRC, no it did not report any error.
To be honest, I watched the offset only increase over the time I had ntpd
-sd running.
As soon as I had run ntpdate and started ntpd again with -sd the offsets
were +/- 0.000xx values.
Oh by the way, ntpd does not like, if it is running, that ntpdate sets the
clock. A bug? ntpd totally stopped synching after I did a one time sync
with ntpdate while ntpd was running.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://ashemedai.deviantart.com/
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/
The taller the bamboo grows, the lower it bends. - Chinese saying
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]