DragonFly BSD
DragonFly submit List (threaded) for 2005-01
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dfports/x11/xorg-documents 6.7.0 -> 6.8.1


From: Roland Hammerle <rjh@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 19:57:49 +0100

> <41D6C24B.9010702@xxxxxxxxxxx> <41B8D482-5C1E-11D9-A18D-000A95AD52FA@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <41B8D482-5C1E-11D9-A18D-000A95AD52FA@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <41d6f2b1$0$718$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.109.161.44
X-Trace: 1104605873 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 718 80.109.161.44
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.submit:2472

Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> On 01.01.2005, at 16:31, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> However, there is a big showstopper. I tried running KDE and  
>>>>>>> GNOME  and both crashed after the update. Please read the  
>>>>>>> following  messages to find out what happened...
>>>>>>> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=136823+0+current/  
>>>>>>> freebsd-ports
>>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2004-December/  
>>>>>>> 001360.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is FreeBSD doing to get xorg-6.8.1 to work?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2004-December/ 
>>>>> 053858.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.  I incorporated those patches with Hiroki Sato's 
>>>> xorg-6.8.1   patches and everything is working fine so far.
>>>
>>> just as a note: dragonfly doesn't need this, at least -current. 
>>> joerg   finally committed my uthread fake lazy binding libc patches 
>>> and  stuff  should do its job without libxthrstub needed.
>>
>> Well, as of yesterday, gnome applications would crash with xorg-6.8.1  
>> (DragonFly -current).  The new FreeBSD xorg-6.8.1 patches fixed that.
> 
> 
> this feels weird. i'll try and have a look tomorrow or so and upgrade  
> my xorg to see how stuff can be fixed.
> 
> cheers
>   simon
> 

I did an install of DragonFly stable with sources from 2004-12-30 and 
the problem existed then. It works fine with the new xorg patches.



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]