Re: [PATCH] fix /boot/loader for extended slices

[walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> (a) There are no minor versions from the ELF point of view...
> We solve (a) by not using minor numbers...

I remember clearly that you explained that to me once before.
There is (obviously) something I don't understand, however.
Where in the system is this policy actually implemented?

I am guessing that the loader (ld-elf?) determines the policy
regarding the naming of libraries.  Am I correct?

Thanks for any clues.