From: | "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:47:02 +0100 |
On Sunday, 19. December 2004 21:20, Matthew Dillon wrote: > And, finally, after looking at the kernel slice table scanner I > noticed that the kernel seems to use a breadth-first traversal > whereas the boot loader appears to have been using a depth-first > traversal. I changed the boot-loader to use a breadth-first > traversal. maybe we should shape up that scanner code so that it can be used in various consumers (libdisk?). I think this is the only way to ensure that the kernel and consumers (loader, fdisk, installer, etc.) have matching numbers, which I consider crucial for proper transparency for the user cheers simon -- /"\ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature