Re: DragonFly BSD Goals/Direction

[Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:46:29AM -0500, Justin Sherrill wrote:
> 
> In the long term, I'd like to have DragonFly known as a server
> operating system.  Being a BSD platform and trying to catch up on all
> the different desktop enviroments is worthwhile, but we don't have the
> resources to do it better than, say, Canonical, so it's not worth
> having it as our focus.

Desktop support is also mainly a pkgsrc issue.

IMHO, the only worthwile thing we could do on this front is replacing
the current USB stack.

-- 
Francois Tigeot