Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2

[Cédric Berger <cedric@xxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :...
> :could even do modulate state or synproxy state as long as you see the 
> :initial SYN.  If not, you fall back to creating a reduced state.  This 
> :option would, of course, also have a setting where it would always just 
> :create a reduced state and be done with it.
> :
> :As for the name ... maybe, 'extra-tcp-state' with a possible setting 
> :of 'on' (default), 'off' and 'force-off' or something like that.  This 
> :could also be a global setting similar to the timeouts which can also be 
> :set on a per-rule basis.
> :
> :\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
>
>     I came across an interesting item.  I believe (but I'm not entirely
>     sure if I am correct) that NetBSD implies S/SA for TCP keep
>     state and it no longer needs to be specified in the rule.  Is this
>     correct? 

Yes, quoting http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html:

In OpenBSD 4.1 and later, the default flags S/SA are applied to all TCP
filter rules.

Since OpenBSD 4.1, "keep state" is also the default.

Cedric