Re: DMA (was sendmail bug et al..)

[Matthias Schmidt <matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Bill Hacker wrote:
> 
> First glance at the man page, 'dma' looks clean and KISS-driven..
> 
> NOT listening on port 25 takes care of a whole raft of potential exploits. What 
> remans is to check errant script/daemon resistance.

If you find any bugs, inconsistencies etc mail to bugs@.

> Do you know if anyone has tried 'dma' on other-than DFLY platform yet?

It is clean C code and should compile out-of-the-box on *BSD.  At least
dma compiles and works with DragonFly and FreeBSD.  But I'm sure it
could work under almost all Unixes ...

	Matthias