DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2007-09
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: port-amd64 branch
ok, then i will post those complex patches that changes system level
and i386 sources first.
Noah
On 9/4/07, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote:
>
> :I don't think this will improve anything and has only confusing impact
> :on the cvs repository. What will a branch achieve? People will have to
> :check out the branch manually so that they can try it. This is not
> :different from using the git repo to check out your current status.
> :
> :However if you are feeling comfortable with the current state of affairs
> :and if it doesn't break the i386 kernel, you should commit your changes
> :directly to the cvs tree.
> :
> :cheers
> : simon
>
> Yah, I agree. Commit directly to HEAD. No branch needed. If you
> need to make complex changes in the build that effect i386 put them up
> for review first, but anything specifically for amd64 can go right in.
>
> -Matt
> Matthew Dillon
> <dillon@backplane.com>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]