Re: Initial filesystem design synopsis.

["Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote:

>     Plus, I need a name for this baby. I can't use DFS, however much I 
>     want to, because the term is already over-used.

Clusterable Logless Unix Segmented Transactional Efficient Rewindable File
System

	CLUSTERFS :)

	Or perhaps just CUFS - Clusterable Unix File System.

	Or should there be some fatal flaw[1] lurking undiscovered in the
design it could become instead:

Dillon's Infinitely Snapshotable And Segmented Transactional Exabyte
Repository

	<g d+r>

[1] Unlikely given Matt's track record of course.

-- 
C:>WIN                                      |   Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins.                | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    licences available see
                                            |    http://www.sohara.org/