Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?)

["Tobias Schacht" <tsmail05@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/1/07, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote:

>     No, its a lot more complex then that.  There are three basic issues:
>
>     * Redundancy in a heavily distributed environment
>
>     * Transactional Consistency.
>
>     * Cache Coherency and conflict management.

Hm, I wonder how plan9 solved these issues? AFAIK they have at least a
snapshots capable fs (long before zfs) and since their scope also is a
distributed environment, it may be a good idea to take a look and
maybe borrow some ideas?

But I'm really no expert here, so anybody with a clue is invited to
comment on that. ;)