Re: Virtual kernel progress update

["Thomas E. Spanjaard" <tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     There are still a ton of things that I have to get working, but the
>     VKERNEL now boots through to the point where it tries to vmfork() the
>     init process. 

Good stuff :).

>     * A Pseudo network interface has to be designed and built (so you can 
>       login to the virtual kernel in some way other then the console).

A backend to a tap(4) interface? E.g. Qemu uses that.

Cheers,
--
        Thomas E. Spanjaard
        tgen@netphreax.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature