DragonFly BSD
DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2005-06
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PAE with dragonfly


From: "Kachun Lee" <kachun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:18:04 -0700

"David Rhodus" <sdrhodus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:fe77c96b05060812014797aa3e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 6/8/05, Craig Dooley <xlnxminusx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Doesn't AMD64 use PAE for large address spaces?  I thought the Page
>> Table structures were the same for both.
>>
>> -Craig
>
> No, on AMD64 when operating in long mode the address space is 64bit.
> PAE is a 32bit hack that lets you access a few more bits.  34, 37 ?  I
> don't recall exactly off the top of my head.
>
> There are some interesting uses for PAE on the regular ia32
> architecture such as allowing the kernel a full 4Gig memory and the
> userland a full 4Gig of memory.  This actually makes the kernels life
> a lot easier, though almost no one has this type of setup so its
> mostly a moot development point.  About a year ago I had a working
> implementation of PAE working on DragonFly, though I only had one test
> machine with 4.5 Gigs of memory.  I also only had access to the
> machine for a few days so I never had time to go through and optimize
> the code.
>
> I can look around for the old patch if someone has access to some
> machines with more than 4 gigs of memory and someone that also has
> time to revive it.
>
> -DR

I have a dual Xeon system with 6G RAM sitting on my bench that I can use. 
For our application, I will need to get the twe driver to be PAE 'safe' 
also, but I have some time that I can spend on this project.

Kachun 





[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]