Re: unionfs: anyone working on this?

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10.05.2005, at 03:45, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     It needs a from-scratch rewrite but the rewrite would be
>     considerably less complex then the original implementation because 
> it
>     would only have to implement the new N*() VOP's instead of the old 
> one's
>     and would be able to return the original vnode rather then 
> maintain a
>     fake vnode.

hmm... I still don't understand how we can override the vnops without 
faking vnodes?!

cheers
  simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part