Re: Version numbering for release DECISION!

[Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Erik P. Skaalerud" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>My vote goes on having the pre-release branch (like RELENG_X) named
>something completely else than -STABLE.

Matt said -STABLE would be the post-release branch, not the pre-release
branch.

    DragonFly 1.2-STABLE        - Builds based on commits made on the release 
                                  branch after the release will be called   
                                  -STABLE, with the same version number of
                                  the release.
													  
>A new naming scheme should rather show that a release with patchlevels
>is way more stable than any pre-release branch.

That's precisely what the above is.

R